Preserve the evidence
Save the notice, package name, version code, cited policy, timestamps and case identifier. Record which account owner can access the relevant Console page. Do not distribute the notice publicly with personal details or authentication links intact.
Compare the reviewer-described behavior with the precise production artifact and server configuration active at the time. A corrected development build is not evidence that the reviewed release behaved differently.
Separate a factual disagreement from a remediation request
| Situation | Appeal evidence |
|---|---|
| Reported feature is not present | Reproducible navigation and matching release evidence |
| A real defect was corrected | Root cause, changed artifact/configuration and verification steps |
| SDK caused undisclosed behavior | Affected version, removal/update and revised disclosures |
| Ownership or licensing questioned | Genuine rights documentation for the relevant material |
State what you know, what changed and what remains uncertain. Do not invent a security audit, user count or approval from another service.
Use the official response route
Follow the appeal or support route specified in the enforcement notice. Keep subsequent communication attached to the existing case where possible. Repeated copies of the same unsupported message do not add evidence.
Do not create replacement accounts or re-upload an unchanged suspended app to evade enforcement. Review Google's enforcement process for the consequences and permitted response.
Fix the complete user-visible problem
A violation may involve the listing, SDK behavior, web content opened by the app, review access or disclosures—not only Java/Kotlin code. Reproduce the entire flow and verify the release actually available to reviewers.
APKLint's rejection checklist can help structure this investigation. It cannot access Google's internal review evidence, guarantee reinstatement or submit an appeal for you.
An effective appeal is a compact evidence packet: action being challenged, factual explanation, root cause when applicable, implemented correction, reproduction instructions and supporting files. Keep it specific to the cited developer policy, not a lengthy unrelated account history.
Sources and further reading
Reference review: 22 September 2026. Examples illustrate the workflow; check your installed versions, release artifact and account-specific Console requirements before applying them. This guide is not a claim that APKLint executed your project or verified your private account.
Android inspection tools and practical release guides. About APKLint · Report a correction
